Originally Posted by
ND Sol
There is no need to save the images for purposes of criminal prosecution as this is an administrative search. TSO says he saw an anomaly, which required further investigation. End of story. This is not a probable cause situation.
Unless they get before one of those judges whom the defense lawyer convinces that they need to see the proof as to what made their client be given a patdown in the first place. No WBI/NOS image. Judge just might dismiss the case because of that. So I still say those images are saved just incase they really have to produce them.