FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Layover choice: 90 mins in MUC or 3.5 hrs in FRA?
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 7:31 pm
  #2  
hoob
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Programs: AC*E, HH*G
Posts: 182
Mr

Originally Posted by ZenFlyer
These are my choices for an upcoming TATL trip from the US to Italy -- would appreciate opinions as to whether the 90 minutes in MUC is cutting it too close for comfort. The flight has a fairly decent on-time performance record, and my sense is that the MUC airport is relatively small and navigable. My initial instinct was to go for the longer layover in FRA -- depsite the fact that it is FRA -- but now I think I am perhaps being too much of a nervous Nellie, and that 90 mins should be fine. The MUC flight opens up more booking options, which is another factor I need to weigh. Many thanks in advance for your .02.
I would choose MUC every time.. Very easy to navigate newer terminal, much more pleasant than FRA in my experience.
hoob is offline