Originally Posted by
FlyingDiver
LOL. This is getting good. You don't seem to realize that the "intentionally" in your definition works in the favor of the passenger. If it came to a real court, the TSA would have to show that (1) the passenger DID interfere and (2) that they do so intentionally. Which will be hard to do when so many of the things that the TSA claims cause interference are not published and therefor there's no way to show intent.
joe
That is exactly what I meant. That post was in response to someone with a disability that is unable to comply with the process. Are they doing so intentionally NO.