Originally Posted by
eyecue
Dont have to try again. You are forgetting the word intentionally.
LOL. This is getting good. You don't seem to realize that the "intentionally" in your definition works in the favor of the passenger. If it came to a real court, the TSA would have to show that (1) the passenger DID interfere and (2) that they do so intentionally. Which will be hard to do when so many of the things that the TSA claims cause interference are not published and therefor there's no way to show intent.
joe