It's ironic...usually I am all for discussing moderation and the conflicts created by it...BUT THERE IS ANOTHER THREAD IN THE TB FORUMS ON THAT TOPIC!!!! @:-) @:-) @:-)
This one is about
other types of conflicts of interest TB members may face.
Originally Posted by Jenbel
It's not necessarily about immoral activity. It's about ensuring that the nine of you - who represent us - have the best interests of FT at heart. If someone is deeply involved in another site - which competes with FT - how can I be sure that they will put their position as our elected representative of FT above what is asked of them on any other site?
If they cannot do that, then I don't want them representing me - and if they take up such a competing position after they have been elected to TB, then they've misled the people who voted for them about their commitment to FT.
We didn't do a recall mechanism when we reviewed the TB guidelines, arguing that it was unnecessary and difficult. This is the first time I've actually wished for a recall, as I do believe that to continue on as an elected representative of the FT community, while accepting positions of responsibility on a board which potentially competes with FT, shows that you do not have the best interests of FT at heart.
Another rare instance where you and I agree completely.
And I don't think the TB can regulate morality or account for every potential conflicted situation. But most conflict of interest policies are broad outlines of 'what to avoid,' not specific prohibitions against specific activities anyway. And, to me at least, taking a position of leadership in the org chart of a competing organization is pretty much the very definition of creating a conflict of interest when one already has a position of leadership in this place's org chart.