Kudos to Elizabeth for expressing what many feel here.

So instead of hating the system (and some those who work within it), how would we - the educated frequently-flying public - define "an acceptable security system" in a post-hate DHS/TSA world?

How would the passenger and/or baggage screening process change?
What defines an acceptable level of risk?
Who would best be responsible/accountable for administering it?
Who would be be in charge of oversight?


I've just been thinking how good it would be to offer a solution.

Thoughts?