Originally Posted by
RobVox
I gotta just add my quick 2cents, and to admit my bias upfront I read BOTH LH and FT daily (lurking for YEARS on both).
In the article I just read on LH (and unless they changed it because of our unsavory epithets cast from FT) it does not say that WN is No.1 or that DL is No.2. That is not the authors conclusion. That is the result of a LH poll. It is data, biased, self-selected data, but data none-the-less. Not the conclusion of a journalist (or website slant), as was suggested in this thread.
Regardless- their synopsis of each of their reader selected winners was surface level knowledge at best- not the type of research I would have expected out of LH. No angles at all and messy writing that borders on false (like the AA Partner miles working towards elite status).