Not really, because in this case the damage would be irreversible. An agent hits the wrong button and there's no calling back later to fix it, it's done.

That's why it's a significant risk, IMO, yet you speak so casually about it like it's no big deal. Well, when the policy is not on your side, it is a big deal.

I'm not saying your end result can't be done, but there are probably better ways of going about it than you so cavalierly describe.