Originally Posted by
HSVTSO Dean
The point of contention, however, was over a statement TSA made, and that Superguy commented about.
I stand by my statement.
I would suggest while you are may be correct ( I don't know if what he did violated the law, I believe it would depend on intent), making that the 'point of contention' is at best irrelevant.
The point of contention should be IMHO, how the TSA reacts to an employee who not only brought a firearm into his place of appointment, but attempted (whether on purpose or not) to bring it into the sterile area of an airport.