Originally Posted by
ijgordon
Well that's wholly consistent with most of what was posted above. But is the absence of SNA intentional? Does this route not get the Transcon catering? (It did when I took it ~3 years ago).
I thought for some reason CO always just left SNA off by mistake. The route definitely had transcon catering a couple of years ago. I would think SNA has as much revenue demand in F as the other transcon routes, despite the 73Gs.