FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Not a good start
View Single Post
Old Mar 1, 2011, 6:22 am
  #22  
somuchtosee
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, Seoul, temporarily Shanghai
Programs: UA, AA, KE, OZ Hyatt Platinum, Int Ambassador,
Posts: 215
Originally Posted by A_Lee
I don't quite agree with DUF that OZ's website is the absolute worst, as I have seen a few that are worse and a few that are about equal, but it is certainly near the bottom of the barrel. If OZ would simply hire one Westerner with a technical/web background that could whip their website into shape and make it usable with multiple browsers, make sure all their public documents use proper English, and a few other tasks, they'd be a huge leap ahead of where they are now. It would cost them very little and be a big step towards showing that they are trying to be the 5-star airline that they've been awarded. Right now, they have 5-star inflight service, but a 0-star website.
Agree!! Why oh why do they NOT improve their da** website? It cost so L I T T L E!!!! Asiana, you have to be smart about this. website is such a small cost but creates HUGE, I mean H U G E impact and you are neglecting this over what?

Such a huge fan of asiana yet, their website just breaks my heart.
somuchtosee is offline