Originally Posted by
TSORon
Now wait a minute, I'm not the one that is a "strict Constitutionalist", you might want to have a word or two with some of your fellows though, they certainly are.
You're the one who wants to disallow arguments about "humiliating" searches, because the Constitution doesn't say anything about the topic. Yet, you're more than willing to endorse the notion of "administrative" searches, even though the Constitution doesn't say anything about the topic.
So ... how shall we proceed? Is the Constitution a living document, or not?