Originally Posted by
PhoenixRev
At best, the post by Bob is exceptional disingenuous.
The fact the defense did not call a single witness and the jury returned with "not guilty" verdicts in about an hour is a complete repudiation of the prosecution's case and the testimony of the ABQ cop and the TSO supervisor.
Of course, we can all forget hoping that Bob will quote the testifying TSO supervisor who said (paraphrase) "I don't know why we check ID. I just do what I am told."
(But, dang, I might pay good money to see that quote appear on the TSA blog.)
For the life of me, I am still trying to figure out a reason why the TSA would even post something like this. In my 35 years of government service, I do not recall a single instance in which any government agency published something like this after a court case had been decided against them.
Can anyone help me figure out the motivation behind this? I'm baffled.