Originally Posted by
ElizabethConley
Holy Smoke. That really was a "must read."
I fail to see how photographs of a groping, particularly when made by the spouse of the gropee at the request of the gropee can possibly be construed as interfering with the grope.
Furthermore, I do not understand why this woman had to go off alone for her more thorough "private" molestation session. Why was her spouse left behind? I thought victims had the option of having a travel companion with them.
Bolding mine: Because the TSO said it is
As to having a witness present during a private screening, the answer is yes and hubby and/or wife should have stated just that. Also, it does appear from the article that hubby and wife are somewhat seasoned travelers so my question is why did wifey ask after the fact/the gloves "beeped" if the TSO had changed their gloves prior to the opt-out patdown? It is sop for me to ask the TSO to change their gloves if I don't see them change their gloves in front of me prior to my secondary shoe swab.