FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - O/T Ish... Continental blamed over Concorde
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 4:10 am
  #23  
BOH
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Diamond Elite, BA Nothing
Posts: 8,905
Originally Posted by LeisureFirst
If measured in Fahrenheit your safety factor would be 1382/482 = 2.86.
If you're a scientist and measure in Kelvin, it would be 1023/523 = 1.95.

There are plenty of other non-linear relationships which make the answer ambiguous. You might for example consider the force or the air speed under which a particular component fails.
Of course. I only gave an extremely simple and hypothetical example to show the principle. There are normally of course many other complex calculations done first to cater for all sorts of different conditions before you get to the the last part of the ultimate fail value being divided by the design max value. But that ratio is still valid as the very final part of the calculation to derive the "safety factor" number.

And to use your Fahrenheit and Kelvin examples.....there are of course codes of practice and numerous regulations as to which measurement parameters are used...to prevent the best case always being used
BOH is offline