FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - QF32 - how bad was it? (Full damage report)
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 9:09 pm
  #39  
serfty
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,326
Originally Posted by Himeno
...

I'm not sure I'm seeing the problem here... 7L/25R at LAX is longer then MEL's longest (16/34).
The flights ex LAX to MEL typically take over an hour longer then those ex MEL to LAX. This is due to the prevailing jetstream winds which are generally westerly in nature (west to east).

Plucking a date at random with said 388 flights, on September 15th the flight times were 842 minutes for QF93 and 952 minutes for QF94.

So significantly more fuel is required for same distance - hence more mass to accelerate to airspeed upon takeoff.

Last edited by serfty; Dec 5, 2010 at 10:31 pm
serfty is offline