Originally Posted by
WineCountryUA
why in the world are we bashing UA for changes that have not even been hinted at???
Someone who only reads the latest post is going to get worked up for no reason at all.
My post was offered in the spirit of the one it had responded to:
Originally Posted by hans
Makes a lot of sense. I just don't want to get the following email: "We made a mistake. You've spoken and we've listened. The requirements for our 1K elite fliers will now be 120 EQS or 120,000 EQM. Thanks for flying United."
The bolding is obviously mine.
And I hope that readers will have the presence of mind to distinguish a hypothetical from something that's actually transpired. Far from bashing UA, what I wrote can be seen as a "preemptive strike" aimed at eliciting a course away from "enhancements" such as increased EQS for 1K qualification, or tinkering with E+ as a potential way to increase revenue...