<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Baze:
I also suggest a moderator close this thread down as it seems have become nothing more than a back and forth between 2 people.
</font>
Actually, it certainly does not seem to be that at all. I count 5 posters (now 6) who have jumped in here to either oppose the bombardment of forums by one poster or to defend one of those opposing bombardment. All seems perfectly on topic. Yes, doc and gaza seem to have violated the TOS repeatedly, and that might be a reason to lock it, but not for a lack of on-topic support for the thread.
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">
Once again, if you don't want to read something, skip it. It is that easy.</font>
Talk about statements that people have copied and ready to paste. When one poster bombards a forum, it is not the people complaining who are too lazy to go to the next page, but the fact that most
others do not, and the thread dies, unless the interested parties go out of their way to bump it up.
Next, I don't know about you, but after I post to a thread, I hate to hit back, back, back, back, back (yes, it takes 5 page loads to return to page 2 using the back button). Instead, I press the jump to forum link, but guess what page that takes you to? Page 1! The whole system is designed to make it easy to participate on page 1 threads, and harder to participate on page 2 threads.
I, personally, don't mind that it makes it harder if people are having vibrant conversation that overflows the first page, but I do mind if they are posts which generate little, if any, participation from others. I also mind that those discussionless threads mean that many other posters will no longer read them out of
their laziness.
I suppose we could all go around bumping the threads whihc interest us, adding nothing new?
Sadly, no
Have a great day!
