Originally Posted by
ExCrew
Just because you don't have a dog in the fight, does that mean you wouldn't defend the underdog here?
I hope you're not speaking about the FlyerTalk community as a whole here, because quite a few people would take serious issue with your comments.
Your "this doesn't concern me...why should I care?" attitude kind of flies in the face of the reason a lot of us participate in FlyerTalk.
Let's just say that this is one I am not going to stick my neck out over...
I am certainly not intending to speak for the FT Community as a whole... but, once UA announced the change to the CR-1 policy, there were a lot of thank you's and a lot less activity / complaining. (and look at some of the threads on FT if you want to see how 'underdogs' are thought of: referring to 'common' MP'rs as 'Kettles'. The consistent reference to 'lowly 2p's'...)
Please do start the thread I suggested: 'EQS 1K'rs Unite: We demand 100!' Let's see what happens.
ExCrew: I do empathize with my fellow FT'ers. If there is something else that is important to you that you would like me to fight for, let me know.
I just can't get enraged over the 100 to 120 EQS 1K qualifying issue.