<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by venk:
Joe does have a viewpoint worth thinking about in most everything he writes. Whether it is delivered in a palatable form or in an irrefutable form is subject to debate but that does not necessarily relegate the viewpoint itself to the la-la land of National Enquirer.</font>
No, but sensationalism and extrapolating conclusions from false facts does!
This article is neither palatable or irefutable and I fail to see how one would argue it is. Some argue that the conclusions have merit even if the facts don't support it, I argue the wrong conclusions were drawn from the observations!
[This message has been edited by AAlton (edited Feb 15, 2004).]