<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by AAlton:
What? By this arguement the National Enquirer has more substance than the Wall Street Journal! The fact is, in this article, the supporting facts behind his arguement is false. I fail to see how that contributes any substance.</font>
That would be an interpolation of my statement not supported by any formal system of logic. Joe providing a substantial point of view in a manner that would be unacceptable and inconsistent with the mainstream media does not imply any one spouting off outside the mainstream media has substance.
Joe does have a viewpoint worth thinking about in most everything he writes. Whether it is delivered in a palatable form or in an irrefutable form is subject to debate but that does not necessarily relegate the viewpoint itself to the la-la land of National Enquirer.