I guess these titles serve 2 purposes:

1. Showing a current position/authority (moderator/talkboard member)
2. Award/sign of respect (evangelist/original member)

I guess ambassador is a bit between.

Comments from (former) TB members, will have some more authority in many cases, and they also have the knowledge on how many things work. Others might want to PM them before suggesting on FT or to TB etc.
+ I feel this info is more important then any of the 2 mentioned in point 2 above.

If you dont see my point, you might want to agree that we remove whats under 2. ? I dont see it gains anything at all, but its a sign of respect.

If thats the case, I dont really see the need for ambassador title either, as the thread is supposed to be flamefree, and volunteers can help there in any case without the title.

Not to confuse, I support these titles, but lets use the same types of principles for all titles.