Originally Posted by
tkey75
Morally, considering the content of the screening, we'll agree it doesn't. Legally, you bet it does until otherwise decided.
So if vaginal penetration of passengers were part of TSA SOP, it wouldn't be illegal?
Just wait until there's a vaginally-concealed explosive used in a terrorist attack or attempted one, and then we'll find out.
Haven't vaginally-concealed drugs already been used as an excuse by the likes of DHS to have the labia and/or vaginas of passengers penetrated by the digits of "authorities"?
Originally Posted by
tkey75
I guess that's why it says "Application of Tariff" to indicate usage of the ticket, rather than just the act of buying it creating the contract.
That is just a guess but if it changes any thing in relation to what I posted earlier, there's certainly been no evidence of such presented anywhere here.