Originally Posted by
eyecue
She is being called into doubt because she relates a patdown that is not part of our program. We have specific order of coverage and steps. Either the interviewee has a huge memory problem or she is making this up. There is also no chance that it was opposite gender screening.
Because, of course, there's absolutely no possibility that the TSOs on duty would ever do anything in violation of SOP, because every TSO is fully informed on SOPs and always executes them exactly as written. Right?