Thanks FliesWay2Much. I may do that, but I'm really not trying to just create problems. And contrary to some of the assumptions on here, I'm really not trying to get a TSO convicted of sexual assault. There are other outcomes that could be just as advantageous in our effort to keep our rights. As stated before, TSOs do not check their sexual impulses at the door when they get to work. Furthermore, the TSA cannot ask them their sexual orientation. We are left to our own devices as to the reasonableness of the touching.

I sincerely believe that the severity of interference with individual liberty and privacy that WBI and Enhanced Patdowns pose cannot be understated. Furthermore, as the primary level of security, it is more intensive and extensive than is necessary to detect threats. And finally, we cannot guarantee that it is done in good faith by the TSO actors. Therefore, I must reject this method of screening. These measures were instituted recently and I cannot reasonably elect not to fly in the near future due the unalienable right to my "pursuit of happiness"* [read: income]. I believe these methods are unconstitutional. Hence, I believe that it is my duty as a citizen to pursue every avenue possible to have these overturned. This includes using tools in the Judiciary, Executive, and Legislative Branches, as well as the 4th Branch.




------------
*"All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain natural and unalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness."