Originally Posted by
RichardKenner
No, of course not!
So how is it that you inform us that
Originally Posted by
RichardKenner
... that phenomenon is exactly why TSA has devices that inject images of such things into the real images periodically.
when I commented that
rare objects are often missed in visual searches by humans?
By the way, I also enjoyed your critique of the article (which I somehow doubt you read)
Originally Posted by
RichardKenner
Wow, that has got to be one of the best examples of doing research to prove what's already quite obvious!
I´m sure the peer reviewers of that paper (specialists in the field selected by the World´s most respected scientific journal) would be interested to know.
Originally Posted by
RichardKenner
In the most recent case I posted about, I was talking about the system that projects training images onto x-rays. That's an example of something that I think was done "right". I would feel that whatever my view of the screening process or the TSA as a whole was.
I would appreciate if you could provide a reference regarding the existence of such a system in use by the TSA today.