Originally Posted by
RichardInSF
Take for example, the one semi-controversial item the TB spent time on this year. First it passed a motion declaring that its "sense" was to do something. Then it passed a motion doing something. Then it passed a motion undoing the previous one. Then it finally tried another motion to do something, which failed.
It almost doesn't matter what the topic was, doesn't that sound a lot like gridlock?
Some might agree with that question and some might not. Heck some might even go on record voicing their agreement only to later reconsider and instead disagree with it.