FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - First Class: BA or Cathay Pacific?
View Single Post
Old Oct 30, 2010 | 12:32 pm
  #24  
Dr. HFH
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QRPC PLT/OW EMD; Bonvoy LT Titanium
Posts: 14,571
Originally Posted by ASUDan130
What would you choose in First BA or Cathay?
CX, and by a country mile. I would go out of my way (and have) to fly CX F.


Originally Posted by macabus
... but the Balik Salmon Tsar Nikolaj and high-quality Caviar are worth the price of admission. Plus, the Krug and Lynch Bages Bordeaux rock!
I completely agree with Macabus. And if F isn't full, they'll keep dishing out both the salmon and caviar, as much as you like, until they run out. My record is two servings before the main meal, then another as a mid-flight snack. That salmon is like butter.

I've posted this elsewhere on FT, but I've been the only F pax HKG-LAX on 884 twice in the past few years (both times before the conversion to the Olympus product). Once I drank a whole bottle of Krug (I know, Mac, I'm still an amateur compared to you!!) and the FAs, seeing how much I enjoyed it, gave me an unopened bottle as I was deplaning.


Originally Posted by gleff
^ on the salmon and caviar. Perfectly happy with the wine. But overall the food is not above average for int'l F. I'd rate food on NH, OZ, SQ to be better.. even food on LX, LH as well but that may be a more controversial claim.
I was unimpressed with the food a few months ago on LH, Gleff, but on my January trip I'm taking NH over and OZ back. Can't wait to try them!!


Originally Posted by gleff
But I don't think we should let everything else wonderful about it cloud judgment about the food which outside of a couple of high points is really quite average.
Sorry, can't agree with you on that one. I'd give CX LH F food a B+/A-, and but for one nearly inedible shrimp dish, it would have been A/A- consistently.
Dr. HFH is offline