Originally Posted by
LarryJ
No. I'm talking about the one test that planemechanic related on which he participated. His assertion was that one test proves that interference is impossible. It does not.
I made no such claim.
I said that in a real test involving much more electronic interference that you would ever expect to see in the real world that the monitoring equipment detected no interference. This is in contrast to your repeated claims of unverified interference by pilots. Your "reports" are all unverifiable and unprovable, while the test I was last involved in (and it has not been the only one) was verifiable and provable, and it showed no interference.
Originally Posted by
LarryJ
I hope your adherence to the rules and procedures is a bit better with regard to following the procedures in the maintenance manuals while you are performing your job. I'd hate to think that you only comply with the procedures and requirements with which you agree.
Sure, just as I would like to think that your piloting was based more on real world experience and not urban legends about cell phones causing airplanes to crash. You have no evidence that I do anything other than fully comply with all required maintenance rules, while we do have evidence that you are piloting while being concerned about myths that don't actually happen in the real world.
For example, here is a list of the last five air crashes attributed to cell phone interference:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Oops, notice the list is blank?