Originally Posted by
eyecue
Think about that: If the scrotum is that high on the pubic bone then there is a problem with his anatomy. So you see, there is an issue with the image that leaves interpretation. It is not like you are looking at the center folds in a skin mag.
And you are qualified to determine there's a problem with his anatomy how?
Some guys have big balls. Some don't. Each guy is different.
But you're ignoring the issue. It doesn't matter whether it's skin mag quality or not. The point is it's still too invasive, especially when there are other less invasive alternatives that accomplish the same thing.