Originally Posted by
eyecue
Think about that: If the scrotum is that high on the pubic bone then there is a problem with his anatomy. So you see, there is an issue with the image that leaves interpretation. It is not like you are looking at the center folds in a skin mag.
It is readily apparent to me that the male individual is wearing either briefs or an athletic supporter, both of which would hold the entire exterior penile complex higher on the anatomy (i.e., I don't think there is anything anatomically incorrect with the male subject). However, the mere fact that I can see the bottom of the scrotal sac, along with the anal cleft, in a 300dpi rear-view image means this shows too much detail.