FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - OT: No stinking "Conformance" at MUC
View Single Post
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 10:56 am
  #66  
Flying Lawyer
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott LT Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH LT SEN, QR Platinum. BA Silver (going down further)
Posts: 10,235
Originally Posted by Zamoyska
It's the most densely-populated area in England which happens to be the most densely-populated country in Europe.
I would suspect that the most densely-popilated country in Europe is (if not Vatican City or Monaco) the Netherlands.

Originally Posted by HIDDY
MUC - Passengers numbers = 16 million.
LHR - Passenger numbers = 60 million.

Apples and oranges.
Certainly not. Comparing LHR and MUC is not the real comparism because I do not care about the size of LHR when I change from BA to BA (or LH to bmi). You need to compare MUC T2 to LHR T5 or LHR T1. BAA (and so can't BA) can even not manage a smooth transfer from a T5 to a T5 flight without customs and passport checks. At MUC T2 a US to Germany transfer works in 20 or even lesse minutes with immiigration and customs.
Flying Lawyer is offline