<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Plato90s:
Yes, but even then it was 2 different rules.
One rule for domestic travel, another for internationational travel. Your continued belief that what's true for one should apply to the other is the problem.
For example, the rules of evidence are a lot looser which is why O.J. was easily convicted in the civil trial even though he was acquitted in a criminal trial. Does that mean that civil and criminal court should have the same rules, or is it just bad extrapolation to insist that all rules are the same just because one institution, whether it's AA or the state of California, issued them.</font>
Yes, I clearly see the connection between Flagship Lounge access and the laws governing a civil or criminal court for a murder trial.
Makes perfect sense.