FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Interrogated and Detained at IAH for Photographing
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 12:32 pm
  #430  
wildcatlh
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: FLL
Posts: 393
Originally Posted by Custardthecat
Heres a scenario for you

Lets say it involves an individual, or number of individuals and your house, thus:

Whilst driving past your nice house the local fuzz see someone taking pictures of your house from a vehicle (including your security system /alarm) and that nice new BMW / Lexus in your drive

scenario 1.

Cops pull up and ask whats occurring

Individual(s) state their business as realtors involved in house sale and appear to be able to attain credibility in this respect (by whatever means) and cops drive away, suspicions abated

or

Individuals refuse to assist cops in enquiries stating its a free country and they can do as they please in terms of taking pictures. Cops either push it, or they don't

or

Cops see pictures taken and whilst thinking, thats a little odd they drive on thinking its none of their business as no crime is being committed and the person(s) is obviously exercising their rights and it's not suspicious at all because they have 'a right' to do it.

next night


Nothing at all happens

or

Your house is violently entered your family held at knife point while the keys are demanded and your stolen to order car is never seen again, except on another continent having been shipped out on a container within 24hrs and your loved ones are traumatised to boot.


then


You become aware that there was unusual activity unacted upon by the Police who could have put in a challenge and thus detterred the crims what would be your feelings. 'Don'y worry, you upheld their rights in doing nothing to be curious and challenge' or would you file suit for neglect (not sure how it works over there).

Different when it's closer to home, perhaps

In the case of your house and someone perhaps casing it, what would you, have the officers do?

A. Approach and clear suspicion that they are legitimate

B. Nothing
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that police officers are under no duty to protect us. So there'd be no recourse against the police regardless of what they did or didn't do.

We could be completely safe if we lived in a police state. If we didn't have rights guaranteed to us under Natural Law (the United States Constitution isn't a guarantor of our rights; it's a limit on what the government can do to deny us those rights), if police could investigate anyone they wanted, search without cause, we'd be safer. But it wouldn't be worth it.

As for anything else? Thomas Paine once said that "He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." Sounds like a pretty good way to think about things to me.
wildcatlh is offline