Originally Posted by
essxjay
Actually, that's precisely the relevant hinge. Your perspective belies a position of assumed guilt whereas the context under consideration -- a U.S. airport governed by U.S. law -- the reasonable and operating presumption is one of innocence.
Flatly untrue.
August of 2006, btw. While conjecture about would've been has little argumentative merit, I must give you snaps for having the cojenes to take a swan dive into TS/S within minutes of registering here just four days ago.
Welcome to Flyertalk,
Custardthecat.
When I said suspicion is a universal concept, I simply meant the things that go to form a suspicion e.g in the mind of whatever official are not that much different in the different parts of the world we live in, thats all. Behavoiral aspects surely don't differ that much
Thanks for the welcome. It is appreciated. Swan dive..well maybe, I'll give you that it does appear so, but you know. If it's woth doing...it's worth overdoing!! That's Brit humour BTW, before the roof falls in!