Originally Posted by
PhoenixRev
What are you talking about? What organization?
I quoted a security expert who raised a very valid point: there were no discussions about the photography of the 9/11 plotters or Timothy McVeigh or others.
So why are photographers getting scrutiny for doing legal things?
What - exactly - is suspicious about taking photos of security areas or security personnel in an airport?
First of all, my apologies for using the term 'utter garbage'. I edited to simply say false. I responded to the UK examples and related organisation you mentioned (within your quote) that apparantley was' not known for photography'.
Why are they getting scrutiny....... I think I have to refer you back to my previous answer. I am not responsible for every developing suspicion relating to this subject, however many there are. My earlier responses addressed the interaction of the OP in this case and my opinion of it. I'm not going to broaden it out more.
Originally Posted by
WillR
Which organisation?
Very unhelpful to make a blanket dismissal without any specifics
My response address PhoenixRevs post #398 where he posted a quote citing some UK examples (amongst others). I was referring to those. When my response quoted his post, his quote was not shown for whatever reason