Originally Posted by
PhlyingRPh
It is possible to surmise from your statement above that race discrimination was OK when it wasn't against the law. Are you sure this is the position you want to take?
That is the most ridiculous post I've read on FT in a long time.
What you can surmise from my statement is that there is a reason why there
are laws against racial discrimination while there
are not laws against youthful-age discrimination. In fact, there are many laws (as I illustrated already) that specifically discriminate based on youthful age. So your equating the actions of the GA to racial discrimination was, indeed, nonsensical.