FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Items OR Intent- Where is the danger?
View Single Post
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 7:13 pm
  #18  
mozgytog
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 549
Originally Posted by TSORon
Opinions vary. And you are welcome to your opinion.
It's funny, though, that you've confused your opinions and fears with facts.



Hmmm. WMD’s not dangerous. Hmmm, interesting “perspective”.

First of all, WMD has a very different definition than a shoe box sized bomb that someone could smuggle in hand-carried luggage, clothing or a body cavity. Second, as we found out from the last circus, the government has propensity to lie about the presence of WMDs, so it would follow that they would lie about other explosives. Third, if terrorists actually had their hands on real WMDs in the United States, they'd be taking out targets from safe distances with military grade hardware, not trying to smuggle C4 in a pair of loafers. And finally, the TSA has never caught a single person in any of its screenings carrying a bomb through a checkpoint. If attempts were being made, I'd have expected it to be all over every major news outlet in the English speaking world at least once in the last 9 years.

So yeah, I'm going with 'the Bogeyman is made of paper.'

Once again, opinions vary. I know I’m not going to change your mind, so I’ll just leave it at I know a bit more about the subject than you seem to. So, you are more than welcome to your opinion, and I to mine.
You certainly do know a lot about fear and paranoia.



Lets see, I have a job. That job is to do my very best to safeguard the flying public. I have a bunch of equipment, training, and experience to assist me in doing that job, as well as the full resources of the federal government to assist. I am one, and only one, part of the system that keeps the flying public safe. There are many thousands of us who do the same job, and many more thousands who provide support in one form or another to that very same end.
Nothing you do keeps me safe in any way, and even if it did, I wouldn't want you doing any of it. Do you understand that at all? You are part of a giant work-fare organization (and the fact that the stimulus money is being used to pay for all this 'equipment, training and experience demonstrates that) which is designed to provide the illusion of security to people who rarely venture outside their own home towns, but love to vote. It's also designed to line the pockets of people like Chertoff who have a major financial stake in setting up rules that cause the companies they hold stock in to make huge profits and pay out to shareholders.

I am proud of who I am and what I do. I know I make a difference, despite the inane and ignorant rantings of some of the public. I like the people I work with, and the passengers I work for. I genuinely enjoy meeting them, talking with them, interacting. There is nothing in any of that to be afraid of. Nor am I giving up any liberties that any other employee of any kind gives up. I don’t need to “suck the marrow” out of life, l prefer to enjoy life rather than struggle with it. I don’t see it as a fight but as an adventure. I’m happy with what I do, and that is all that really matters.
I know you're proud of what you do. That's part of the problem that many people, including huge numbers of frequent flyers, have with the TSA and the people that it employs. The mindset that is selected for is so at odds with the American spirit that it's disheartening and embarrassing. It's time to dial the fear back a notch or three. There is absolutely no reason for us to have spent the last nine years on 'elevated' alert as a country, and even less for it to be constantly 'high' at airports.

I look forward to the day that ends and we go back to life as normal. That the scale goes down to green and eventually it's forgotten like the fallout shelters of the cold war. Do you have any desire at all for that day to come?

Originally Posted by TSORon
You were not asking for facts. I was responding to the posted question. What if “intent” was all we focused on? “Which is more important” was not asked. If knowing intent is all we need to ensure the safety of the flying public then why not allow bombs and guns through the checkpoint? Without the intent to use them they pose no danger. Right?
I have no problem at all with people who are licensed to conceal firearms doing so on an airplane. By and large, the people who possess such licenses are less likely to engage in criminal activities than even police officers.

Why should I be afraid of them?

Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Sep 2, 2010 at 1:09 pm Reason: merge consecutive posts
mozgytog is offline