Originally Posted by
SWCPHX
Oh I would have absolutely voted not guilty. No way would I accept the only evidence of a drug sale as being the handwritten scrawl on the officer's leg. Investigations are just not run that way.
I'd hope so-- perhaps I was unfair; you are more educated than the jurors there were.
Even after being told all of the things that that Coleman character did, the jurors interviewed still believed that the people they convicted were guilty.