FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - ACLU quesitioning enhanced patdowns
View Single Post
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 9:21 pm
  #76  
InkUnderNails
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by ScatterX

1) Clear definition of what they are doing and why.
2) Thorough and independently reviewed analysis/data demonstrating that what they want to do is:
A) Necessary
B) Effective
3) Thorough and independently reviewed analysis/data showing what it costs to do X (including cost impacts to the airlines and passengers) to provide a cost/benefit analysis.
4) Proper training to ensure that everything is done correctly and consistently.
5) A formal mechanism that permits feedback/alternatives for law-abiding citizens who have reasonable objections or have been subject to unauthorized behavior.
6) Robust independent oversight of the entire life-cycle (planning, implementation, operation, etc.) to ensure that our tax-dollars are being spent appropriately and effectively.

IMO, the steps above are not too much to ask of the government in general, not just the TSA.

How many of you FT'ers would be happy with the 6 step process above? Additions/changes/etc. are welcome. I'll keep a running list if there is sufficient interest.
People presenting themselves to travel on public transportation should only be physically searched in the following circumstances:

1. They fail to pass the WTMD without alarm after emptying pockets
2. A check of the carry on shows trace explosives that can not be resolved with a search of the bag.
3. The xray machine operator detects WEI in the carry on that is confirmed.

The pat downs we are discussing here are unreasonable searches (my opinion) due to the fact that I refused to undergo another unreasonable search (again my opinion) using the strip search machine.

Most of what ScatterX suggests is reasonable and therefore falls outside of the understanding of DHS. Here is what I would like, and we will see wings on Durocs before it happens:

If I fail to clear the administrative search and the TSA determines that a physical body search is necessary, I would be given a form, signed by the TSO and the supervisor that explains the reason for the search and why it was required. It could be simple check boxes, but the TSA should be required to document for the benefit of the PAX when exceptional measures are taken.

If the search is reasonable, it can be easily documented why it is reasonable.

If it is not reasonable, it should not be done.

Just dreaming, I know.
InkUnderNails is offline