Originally Posted by
clrankin
I'd feel more comfortable if TSA just handed over one of their Pedophile Cancer Imagers as configured at airports to some independent third party who could either confirm or deny their ability to print, store, and/or transmit images as advertised by the TSA.
The independent third party could then pass the machine over to doctors and scientists for testing to verify radiation dosage information. A simple chain of custody could be kept at all times, allowing only cleared people to access the machine, should that become a concern of the paranoid in the agency.
Doing this would go a long way to clearing many valid concerns about this equipment. How about it, Bob? Does the TSA have the guts to turn over one of their Perv-O-Matics for some independent analysis?
If it was up to me, I would nlcertainly not hand it over to someone who used the term "Pedophile Cancer Imagers"; nor would I give them access to any thing handed over to an independant third party. Someone who calls it such as is called on this site, well, they are far from biased, and I doubt ANY evidence will sooth them. All it will do is add fuel to a fire; you can't argue with unreasonable people.
Originally Posted by
Boggie Dog
Backscatter or MMW?
Actual images on the WBI monitor or printed images?
Training images or working images>
I'm concerned because I believe my government is not telling the truth!
Backscatter. Training and real. And no, not at SAT
