Originally Posted by
nth_utsera_sth_utsera
Forgive my ignorance but why was one tasty and the other yuck? Looking at the pictures they both look similarly disagreable. But then again full English breakfasts are broadly about that...
Originally Posted by
travelmad478
I had the same question. They look pretty much identical. Perhaps baggageinhall has an aversion to square dishes?
Originally Posted by
LeisureFirst
The mushrooms are clearly vastly superior in the top pictures: the ones in the bottom look like they could have come out of a tin and look very sorry for themselves in any case. The bacon also looks like it stands a chance of being somewhat crisp, unlike the soggy rubbish in the bottom picture - although it's not certain. The rest isn't clear enough to tell.
LF is spot on. The difference between the two:
(CCR / Arrivals lounge, Concorde Breakfast Room)
Mushrooms - sautéed / straight out of a tin
Bacon - crisp and probably dry cured / barely cooked, fatty and markedly inferior quality
Sausage - herby with a clear pork flavour / boiled poor quality pork
Eggs - soft and fluffy / overcooked and chalky
Tomato - grilled / cut in half and possibly waved at a heat lamp
Beans - the same on both plates
More food based decent into minutiae when I publish my TR.