Originally Posted by
NickB
Perhaps there might be a case for a supermajority for changes to rules of procedures of TB, so what I would suggest would be:
1) simple majority of members (i.e 5) for ordinary votes
2) super majority of 2/3 of TB members (i.e. 6) for 'constitutional' amendments to TB's rules of procedure.
A simple majority might be sufficient for minor things like the US declaring war or passing its annual budget but it would never suffice for crucial matters like whether or not Malev should have its own forum.