Originally Posted by
SATTSO
the previous SOP had us report large sums of cash to LEOs. The current SOP requires us to report large sums of cash to LEOs. The wording of the SOP changed, and that added that carrying cash is not illegal. But the MEANING or DIRECTIVE of the SOP has nit changed.
But I guess you want to argue semantics if the word "changed", because that's all you can argue? Perhaps you should attempt to argue that the SOP the directs the actions of the TSO has changed, as that would be the actual purpose of what I was talking about? But we know you can't do that, right?
Ah, so now you claim the "meaning" of the SOP hasn't changed. Fine.
What you call "semantics", I call being accurate. If you had started off your trip down SOP lane by saying that the "meaning had not changed," we wouldn't be having this discussion. But that isn't what you initially said, is it?