Originally Posted by pmocek

That's not what you said. You said things like that:





And if someone doesn't "have those specific things"? I keep asking you what it means for someone not to be "good to go", but you still haven't said. In fact, it's not completely clear what "good to go" means. Do you mean that if someone shows you identity credentials with the information you listed, that person will be allowed to proceed?

When someone asks about potential trouble from TSA when traveling with damaged ID, I would expect your response to be, "No, you won't have any trouble from us, unless you consider answering a few questions and having you and your belongings thoroughly searched for weapons, explosives, and incendiaries, to be trouble. You don't need to show us ID in the first place. Doing so is optional. It would just get you through our checkpoint with less scrutiny than we'll give you if you don't have it." That's the case, isn't it?