Originally Posted by
SATTSO
I guess it's how I understand things. I was very aware of what you wrote. I simply think it's possible to read and understand the constitution differently, come tk different convulsions than someone else, yet respect the constitution.
But I fear in this country, we have come to a point where people argue that if you read/interpert the constitution differently so that you come to different conclusions as another, then certain people believe you so not respect the constitution. All because you do not believe as they.
SATTSO, this is not about misreading the Constitution but about the TSA lawyers using the "it's not illegal until we get caught" line of logic.
We have seen the push by the TSA to implement policies and equipment without fully rectifying the legal issues. The TSA willfully refuses to put it ducks in a row until it gets caught.