Originally Posted by
essxjay
Not a matter of smarts as such; rather a paucity of information from which to draw conclusions.
Recusal is an application of the law, and I would think jurists recognize when it's necessary to remove oneself from the bench based on the appearance of impartiality.
I understand the basic concept of recusal.
I was speculating if an addition to the witness list was being made in an effort to have a less lenient judge seated to benefit the state.