The page you point to contains a link to the actual text of the law. Normally, in situations such as this, the test is whether doing the things that were done that led to a conviction in the country of the offense is considered to be violating the law (or, in this case, a particular law) in the country one is trying to enter. Where this gets tricky is if the conviction record doesn't contain enough information to know what those facts were. For example, if the conviction were just recorded as a violation of MCL 257.625, it's a much worse situation than if it were recorded as MCL 257.625(6)(a) because in the latter case, it's clear that what's normally considered "a DUI" did not occur.