FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Are liquid rules history?
View Single Post
Old May 10, 2010 | 8:12 pm
  #45  
RadioGirl
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,337
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
The point remains that TSA considers these LGA a large enough threat to not permit them through the checkpoint.

Yet TSA casually tosses these same LGA's into common trash at the checkpoint without any concern they may actually be dangerous.

The two actions do not add up.
Unfortunately, they do add up. To 100%. Here's how:
Originally Posted by SATTSO
They consider LGAs a potenial threat, not a threat, and recognizes hat it would take too long to screen all LGAs.
Deep down, the screeners know that there is a 99.999999999% chance that Spiff's water bottle contains water. And a 0.000000001% chance that it contains the mythical stable-enough-to-carry-but-volatile-enough-to-destroy-a-plane-undetectable-by-ETD explosive that TSA told them about. (Or, as SATTSO puts it, "a potenial (sic) threat".)

In the first instant that they see the water in Spiff's bag, they're focused on the 0.000000001% chance that it's the bogeyman explosive. But as soon as they have possession of it, their minds shift to the 99.999999999% chance that it's just water, and they throw it in the trash. (Or "it would take too long to screen" in SATTSO's words.)

The article in the OP suggests that some screeners in some airports on some days are able to see the 99.999999999% option when they first spot some bottles, and take the statistically sensible (in)action of letting them pass. Spiff's experience indicates that some are not capable of this. It is also clear that no one in TSA is capable of seeing the 0.000000001% option after the bottle is in their hand, and disposing of it as if it really is the mythical liquid explosive.

(I'm also guessing a lot of screeners play the lottery. And lose. )

Last edited by RadioGirl; May 10, 2010 at 8:43 pm Reason: Needed more 9s and 0s! ;)
RadioGirl is online now