FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Are liquid rules history?
View Single Post
Old May 10, 2010 | 1:03 pm
  #27  
Boggie Dog
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,992
Originally Posted by SATTSO
Actually what it comes down to is this: before he departed chertoff said that there were various things TSA coukd do to make the checkpoint/baggage more secure, such as a physical strip search (not WBI) of passengers, and "dumping" everyones luggage, instead of using x-ray. These would be more secure procedres, but would take too long, chertoff said. So we don't do it. Who wants to spend 8 to 10 hours going through a checkpoint?

We have means to test MOST LGA - but we do not, for the same reason mentioned above. It would make the checkpoint inti a hours long process.

So what TSA seems to have done is to prohibit all LGAs is amouts above a certain size, not because those LGAs would always be dangerous (and I do personally believe LGAs represent a potential threat), but because to test all LGAs would take too long. Again, who wants to spend hours upon hours in the checkpoint?

Maybe some people wouldn't mind the extensive extra wait? I do no know, but if I had to guess I would say there are some who wouldn't mind. However, as it is right now, those who decide have decide that such a weight is unacceptable, and all LGAs over a certain size should not be allowed.

Not saying you have to agree with this, but there it is. I'll also note I've post this before.
The point remains that TSA considers these LGA a large enough threat to not permit them through the checkpoint.

Yet TSA casually tosses these same LGA's into common trash at the checkpoint without any concern they may actually be dangerous.

The two actions do not add up.
Boggie Dog is online now